Skoll reflections: what actually stayed with me


Skoll reflections: what actually stayed with me

The real takeaways: not ideas, but patterns shaping how we lead and scale.

Skoll (well that week in Oxford) increasingly feels less like a conference, and more like an impact festival, especially if like me, you don't attend the main event.

Not because of the sessions.
Because of the conversations in between.

Coffee queues. Passing moments.
And the “we should catch up” that actually happens.

This year, a few themes stood out more clearly than anything else.

1. The work is the relationships

A year ago, I had just left Living Goods with a quiet concern:

that my identity and network might shrink.

The opposite happened.

By intentionally staying connected, I realised I knew more people this year than last.

And I showed up differently:

Not starting with “former CEO of …”
But:

“I support leaders and organisations at pivotal moments.”

That shift matters.

Because much of the real value of Skoll is not transactional:

  • It is not just pipeline
  • It is not just visibility

It is:

reconnection, energy, perspective.

For anyone working independently, that is not optional. It is fuel.

2. Portfolio careers are not the soft option

Co-hosting a session on portfolio careers brought a different layer of honesty.

As my co-host Kelsi Kriitmaa put it:

“We unpacked the freedom, independence, fears, and financial realities nobody talks about.”

The reality is both:

  • Freedom and flexibility
  • Loneliness and uncertainty
  • Choice over your work
  • Responsibility to create it

And a few truths that consistently surfaced:

  • It is a business, not a side project
  • Identity is often harder than the work
  • You will get pricing wrong before you get it right
  • You have to build your own structure and pipeline

For me, the biggest shift:

my impact has not reduced. It has changed shape.

Less direct delivery.
More amplifying impact through others.

3. Scaling with government is slower than we admit

One line captured the week:

An agile social entrepreneur is like a jet ski.
Government systems are more like a tanker.

Fast vs slow.
Adaptive vs risk-aware.

But the tanker is where scale lives.

What that means in practice:

  • Fund the conditions for scale, not just the model
  • Accept timelines measured in decades, not funding cycles
  • Work with government, not around it
  • Bring evidence, but stay solution agnostic

And critically:

do not make government look bad.

Not about optics.
About incentives and risk.

This is where many efforts stall.

4. Leadership is still a deeply human experience

Among the big system conversations, the quieter ones stood out most:

“Treat yourself the same way you care for your phone. Recharge.”
“The power of staying quiet.”

Both simple. Neither easy.

Two patterns:

  • We design for output, not recovery
  • We speak to add value, rather than create space

But:

  • Energy depletion erodes judgement
  • Silence enables better thinking and ownership

These are not personal habits.

They are leadership disciplines.

5. Writing as a form of impact

The most unexpected takeaway was the response to writing.

People sharing these emails with their teams.
Referencing pieces before sessions.
Quietly saying, “this is exactly how it feels.”

It reinforced something I have been testing:

impact is not only what you build.
It is what you help others see more clearly.

That came home in a different way after Skoll.

When I saw my mum for dinner the Friday after the week, I told her that a big highlight for me had been the response to my writing.

It caught me slightly off guard saying it out loud.

She paused, then reflected on her own leadership career, in very different contexts, decades earlier.

Different systems. Same experience:

  • isolation
  • responsibility
  • internal pressure

That continuity is hard to ignore.


Final thought

Across all of this, one pattern holds:

  • The work takes longer than we want
  • Leadership is harder than it looks
  • And how we choose to work is changing

But also:

the need for connection, reflection, and shared experience has not changed.

If you have been reading, sharing, or forwarding these reflections, thank you.

And if something here resonates:

what has stayed with you from the past few months?

Thanks for being part of this next chapter with me.

Warmly,
Liz
Strategic Advisor | Former CEO | Founder, Volante

Based in Kenya, available globally

Volante Consulting Kenya

Read more from Volante Consulting Kenya

Boards: one of your biggest assets, or a quiet constraint - download your guide Dear Reader Most boards are not broken. But many are not operating as effectively as they could. And because governance issues often build slowly, the impact can be easy to miss: Decisions slow down Important conversations happen too late Challenge becomes inconsistent Accountability blurs Tension builds quietly between governance and management At their best, boards materially improve the quality of decisions,...

Being kind is not the same as being liked Why leadership requires clarity, accountability and difficult conversations Dear Reader One of the hardest leadership skills is learning how to give bad news well. Not avoiding it.Not delaying it because it feels uncomfortable. Actually doing it. Recently, a leader asked me how best to tell a team member they were being let go. But what they were really worried about was this: “Will this break trust within the wider team?” My answer was simple: In my...

Trust, control and the temptation to rescue The leadership tensions no one really prepares you for Dear Reader One of the biggest surprises for me in leadership was realising how many tensions sit beneath the surface of what we often call “good leadership.” Not obvious right or wrong answers. Tensions. Over the past few weeks, I have been reflecting on two I see repeatedly in CEOs and leadership teams and honestly, in myself too: 🔍 How much visibility is helpful before it becomes control? 🛟...