Boards: one of your biggest assets, or a quiet constraint


​

Boards: one of your biggest assets, or a quiet constraint

Why this is still one of the questions I get asked most often

Dear Reader

I have written about boards before.

And yet it continues to come up in almost every conversation with CEOs.

Not in theory.
In practice.

How do I make my board more useful?
How do I get the right level of challenge?
How do I work effectively with my Chair?
How do we evolve the board as we scale?
How do we handle CEO performance, succession, and strategy properly?

Most boards are not broken.

But many are not working as well as they could.

And the impact of that is significant.

A strong board improves the quality of decisions, strengthens leadership, and helps organisations move faster with more confidence.

A weak or misaligned board creates drag. Often quietly.


Where it typically shows up

Over time, a set of patterns comes up repeatedly:

1. Boards built for the past, not the future​
Composition reflects where the organisation has been, not where it is going. Capability is no longer aligned to the next phase.

2. Support without enough challenge​
Boards are engaged and positive, but do not push thinking far enough. The CEO is supported, but not stretched.

3. Lack of clarity in the Chair–CEO relationship​
The Chair is not a line manager. But without a clear rhythm and trust-based relationship, engagement becomes reactive.

4. Meetings focused on updates, not decisions​
Too much time on reporting. Not enough on trade-offs, risks, and real questions.

5. Weak onboarding, expectations and renewal​
Board members are not set up clearly on their role, contribution, or how performance is assessed over time.

6. Limited discipline on CEO performance, succession and compensation​
Some of the board’s most critical responsibilities are under-structured, delayed, or avoided.

7. Strategy not keeping pace with organisational reality​
The organisation evolves, but the board is not engaging deeply enough in the real shifts required.


What makes the biggest difference in practice

A few shifts tend to unlock disproportionate value:

  • Designing the board for the next 3 to 5 years, not the last
  • Being explicit about what the board is there to do, and what it is not
  • Building a strong, regular Chair–CEO rhythm
  • Structuring board meetings around decisions, not updates
  • Creating clarity on individual board member contribution
  • Treating CEO performance, succession and compensation with the discipline they require
  • Using the board to improve judgement, not just approve plans

None of this is complicated.
But it does require deliberate design.


A new Volante guide

I have pulled together these themes, along with practical tools and a board effectiveness diagnostic, into a new guide:

Working More Effectively with Your Board

It is designed to help CEOs and Chairs:

  • Assess where their board is today
  • Identify where it is underperforming
  • Make practical shifts to improve how it works

I will be sharing more soon.


A question to reflect on

If you are a CEO or Board Chair:

👉 Where does your board genuinely improve the quality of decisions, and where does it create friction or slow you down?

That answer usually tells you where to start.

Warmly,
​Liz​
​Strategic Advisor | Former CEO | Founder, Volante

Based in Kenya, available globally

Volante Consulting Kenya

Read more from Volante Consulting Kenya

Leaders don't have to have all the answers On the leader we think we should be, the value of thinking space, and why leadership can still be lonely Dear Reader, I recently came across a quote that has stayed with me: “Your leadership style is the projection of the movie you are playing in your head.” I thought: wow. And then I started wondering what movie was playing in my head when I first became a CEO. I think, for quite a long time, it was some version of fake it till you make it. Possibly...

What are we changing, and what are we losing? Some reflections on AI, early career learning and what we are really looking for when we hire leaders. Dear Reader, I was talking with someone recently about the start of my career, which was, slightly alarmingly, more than 30 years ago. I was on a graduate scheme with a multinational food manufacturer. One of my first jobs was dealing with customer complaints. People would sometimes send the actual product back, and I had to work out what had...

We may be making hiring harder than it needs to be Better hiring isn't about eliminating risk. It is about getting better evidence and learning from the decisions we make. Dear Reader, Last week, I wrote about some of the hardest people decisions CEOs face once someone is already in the organisation. This week, I want to look at what happens before they get there. Hiring is one of the hardest parts of leadership. It is also something I think many organisations make more complicated than it...